Clinical outcomes with drug-eluting stents, bare-metal stents, and bioresorbable scaffolds implanted in patients with AMI treated with primary PCI. Data from the Prague-18 trial
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Background Drug-eluting stents (DESs) are the recommended choice of for primary PCI. Purpose/Methods The study aimed to determine why interventional cardiologists used non-DESs and how they had influenced patient prognosis. efficacy safety outcomes different were also compared in treated with either prasugrel or ticagrelor. Results Of PRAGUE 18 patients, 749 (67.4%) DESs, 296 (26.6%) BMS, 66 (5.9%) BVS. Cardiogenic shock at presentation left main disease, especially as culprit lesion, right coronary artery stenosis reasons BMS selection. incidence net-clinical EP (CV death, nonfatal MI, stroke, major bleeding, revascularization) 7 days was 2.6% vs. 6.5%, 3.0% BMSs, BVSs, respectively (HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.419–5.15, P=0.002 DES 1.25 (0.29–5.39) BVS DES, P=0.76). Patients BMSs higher risk death 30 2.20; 1.01–4.76; P=0.045), one year 2.1; 1.19–3.69; P=0.01); composite cardiac re-MI stroke 1.66; 1.0–2.74; P=0.047) year. associated significantly rate EPs Conclusion highest profile preferably contrary a cardiovascular events FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main source(s): Charles University Cardiovascular Research Program P-35 Q-38, University, Czech Republic
منابع مشابه
Clinical outcomes of drug-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents in our routine clinical practice.
INTRODUCTION This study was designed to characterize patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) versus those treated with bare metal stents (BMS) and to investigate their clinical outcomes in our routine clinical practice. METHODS We studied a consecutive series of 1796 patients, selected from a computerized registry, who underwent stenting for coronary artery lesions either with BMS (15...
متن کاملMeta-analysis comparing drug-eluting stents with bare metal stents.
We performed a meta-analysis of 10 randomized trials of 5,066 patients with 6 to 12 months of follow-up. The summary risk differences excluded any major differences between the 2 types of stents for death (0.12%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.34% to 0.58%, p = 0.60) and overall myocardial infarction (0.04%, 95% CI -0.72% to 0.81%, p = 0.91). There was a modest increase in the risk of Q-wave m...
متن کاملLong-term clinical outcomes of drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents in Chinese geriatric patients
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE Little is known about the relative efficacies of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) in elderly patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome for geriatric patients who received either DES or BMS. METHODS From January 2002 to October 2005, 199 consecutive Chinese geriatric patie...
متن کاملUnrestricted Use of Drug-Eluting Stents Compared With Bare-Metal Stents in Routine Clinical Practice
Results Patients receiving DES more often had diabetes mellitus and less often presented with an acute myocardial infarction (MI). At 1 year, cumulative death and MI was 7.6% in DESand 8.7% in BMS-treated patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68 to 1.15; p 0.34). The 1-year rate of target vessel revascularization was 5.0% in DES and 9.2% in BMS patients (p 0....
متن کاملMeta-analysis comparison (nine trials) of outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus.
In patients with diabetes mellitus, outcome after drug-eluting stent (DES) versus bare metal stent (BMS) implantation remains under investigation; although lower reintervention rates were reported, incidence of death and myocardial infarction (MI) during follow-up is not completely characterized. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis of available randomized studies evaluating follow-up events of D...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: European Heart Journal
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['2634-3916']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2158